SEI — Social Entrepreneurship Index
Countries/Eastern Partnership

Belarus

Eastern Partnership · statistics to 2024–25 · policy framework at end-2025 · policy desk-coded from public documents

39.5composite, 0–100
42 / 45rank · 5 of 6 in Eastern Partnership
−0.5change since 2015, time-varying indicators
Economic61.8Legal31.2Financial36.2Institutional47.1Political21.2
BelarusEastern Partnership average

Dimensions

DimensionScoreRank /45EaPEU-27Indicators
Political21.24533.370.07 / 8
Economic61.82350.963.47 / 20
Legal31.24139.266.04 / 12
Institutional47.14152.761.85 / 16
Financial36.23640.262.33 / 7
Composite39.54243.264.726 / 63

Indicators = scored now / in the full SEI matrix. Ties share a rank.

Composite, 2015–2024

3040502015201820212024
BelarusEastern Partnership average

Same goalposts every year. Legal and financial scores are held at their single readings, so change comes from governance, social and labour statistics, firm demography and early-stage entrepreneurship.

Social-enterprise policy and legal framework, end-2025

SE strategy / action plan 1.2.1
S10S233S30S40S50
Criteria and evidence
  • S1 · Status: 0 (none)
    No SE strategy or action plan adopted or announced; a 2024 article by the Ministry of Economy's research institute notes that 'the concept of social entrepreneurship is not enshrined at the legislative level' and proposes, rather than reports, a framework: 'none'. · source 1
  • S2 · Dedication: 33 (SE mentioned in an adopted broader strategy, without measures)
    The same article maps SE-related directions (inclusive employment, self-employment, information support) in the National Sustainable Development Strategy to 2035, the SME strategy 'Belarus - country of successful entrepreneurship' to 2030 and the Socio-Economic Development Programme 2021-2025; no SE chapter or pillar: 'SE mentioned in an adopted broader strategy, without measures'. · source 1 · low confidence
  • S3 · Operational content: 0 (no adopted instrument)
    No adopted SE strategy or action plan: 'no adopted instrument'. · source 1
  • S4 · Monitoring: 0 (none)
    No SE instrument to monitor: 'none'. · source 1
  • S5 · Participation of SE organisations: 0 (no evidence)
    No SE instrument, hence 'no evidence' of SE organisations' participation. · source 1
6.7
Institutional structure & dialogue 1.2.2
I133I20I30I40
Criteria and evidence
  • I1 · Lead responsibility: 33 (SE handled informally or split, no lead named in any official text)
    No body is named responsible in a law, decree or strategy: the Council on Legal and Judicial Activity under the President only found it 'целесообразным поручить Министерству юстиции, Министерству труда и социальной защиты, Министерству экономики' to prepare a concept of SE regulation (23 Nov 2021), with no follow-up reported, and the Ministry of Economy's research institute (2024) names no responsible body, suggesting one could be created only under a future law: 'SE handled informally or split, no lead named in any official text'. · source 1
  • I2 · Breadth of mandate: 0 (none)
    No body holds an SE mandate (the 2024 article names none; support measures are general employment and tax measures): 'none'. · source 1
  • I3 · Consultative body with SE organisations: 0 (none, or only in a draft)
    No consultative body on SE was identified; the 2021 discussion took place in a general presidential council on legal affairs: 'none'. · source 1
  • I4 · Inter-ministerial coordination: 0 (none)
    The 2021 joint tasking of three ministries was an advisory council's finding, not an adopted text or a coordination body, and no follow-up is reported: 'none'. · source 1
8.3
Social clauses in public procurement 2.3.2
P167P20P30P40
Criteria and evidence
  • P1 · Legal basis: 67 (contracts reservable for a subset (sheltered workshops, WISE, disadvantaged workers; Directive 2014/24 Art. 20) or preferences for cooperatives/SMEs that include SE)
    Law No. 419-Z on public procurement lets the Council of Ministers set a preferential amendment for own goods, works and services of organisations where persons with disabilities are at least 50% of staff (Art. 8) and reserves lots of up to 10% for SMEs (Art. 31(2)): 'contracts reservable for a subset (sheltered workshops ...) or preferences for cooperatives/SMEs that include SE'. · source 1
  • P2 · National policy push: 0 (none)
    No national guidance or plan on socially responsible procurement found; Art. 39 evaluation criteria name no social criterion: 'none'. · source 1 · low confidence
  • P3 · Evidence of use: 0 (none)
    No figures or cases on the use of the disability preference found: 'none'. · source 1 · low confidence
  • P4 · Capacity support: 0 (none)
    No training or helpdesk covering the preference or social clauses found: 'none'. · source 1 · low confidence
16.7
Official SE definition 3.1
D10D20
Criteria and evidence
  • D1 · Where defined: 0 (nowhere (a lapsed draft counts as nowhere))
    'The concept of social entrepreneurship is not enshrined at the legislative level' (Ministry of Economy research institute, 2024); no strategy definition found: 'nowhere'. · source 1
  • D2 · Content (social aim; participatory governance; limits on profit distribution): 0 (none of the three, or no definition)
    No definition counted in D1: 'no definition'. · source 1
0.0
Legal recognition of SEs 3.2.1 · level 0 of 3
None · sources 1 2
L10L20L30L40L50
Criteria and evidence
  • L1 · Adoption stage: 0 (none, announced, or consultation draft)
  • L2 · Scope: 0 (none)
  • L3 · Implementing rules: 0 (none adopted, or law not in force)
  • L4 · Status or register: 0 (foreseen with no entity recognised, or law not in force)
  • L5 · Bodies foreseen by the law: 0 (foreseen, not set up, or law not in force)
0.0
SE support ecosystem 4.3.6
E133E267E333E40E533
Criteria and evidence
  • E1 · National programme: 33 (project-based only (donor, EU or NGO projects without government lead))
    SE support came from the EU-funded, UNDP-implemented project 'Support to Economic Development at the Local Level' (May 2018-Nov 2025, national partner Ministry of Economy), whose support ecosystem targets 'enterprises addressing socially important issues': 'project-based only (donor, EU or NGO projects without government lead)'. · source 1
  • E2 · Territorial coverage: 67 (several regions)
    The project works in 'at least 12 districts' of Belarus; no national network of SE centres: 'several regions'. · source 1
  • E3 · Public funding of support: 33 (mainly donor or EU funded)
    Donors are the European Commission, Poland and UNDP: 'mainly donor or EU funded'. · source 1
  • E4 · Continuity: 0 (none)
    The only SE-relevant support, the EU/UNDP project 'Support to Economic Development at the Local Level' (May 2018-Nov 2025), delivered USD 9,111 in 2024 and closed in November 2025, so no SE support programme was operating on 31 Dec 2025: 'none'. · source 1
  • E5 · Range of services: 33 (one)
    The project page documents 'access to new financial mechanisms at the local level' and capacity building; a supported initiative received equipment and a four-month entrepreneurship bootcamp for its workers (UNDP, Feb 2023); no incubation, legal advice, impact measurement or market access is documented: 'one' (finance). · source 1
33.3
EU funds mobilised for SE 5.1.1
F167F233F367F467
Criteria and evidence
  • F1 · Programming: 67 (SE an explicit priority or target group in the national programme(s), or in the EU country programme)
    The EU-funded action names 'enterprises addressing socially important issues' as a target group and planned a social entrepreneurship fund of about USD 1.8m (2019); its operation in the period is not verified, and EU cooperation with Belarusian authorities was curtailed after 2020: 'SE an explicit priority or target group in the ... EU country programme'. · source 1 · low confidence
  • F2 · Calls and instruments: 33 (general calls whose themes name social economy or social entrepreneurship, or documented SE grantees in general calls)
    The EU-funded project supported socially important initiatives through its general competitions ('In total, the project supported 40 socially important initiatives in 12 districts of Belarus', UNDP, 15 Feb 2023); no dedicated SE call or EU financial instrument in 2021-2025 was found: 'documented SE grantees in general calls'. · source 1
  • F3 · Channel: 67 (government as co-partner)
    Implemented by UNDP 'in partnership with the Ministry of Economy' (EEAS, 9 Jun 2020): 'government as co-partner'. · source 1
  • F4 · Evidence of take-up: 67 (number of SE beneficiaries or projects reported)
    UNDP reports that the EU-funded project 'supported 40 socially important initiatives in 12 districts of Belarus' (Feb 2023): 'number of SE beneficiaries or projects reported'. · source 1
58.3
Dedicated national funding 5.2.2
N133N20N30N40
Criteria and evidence
  • N1 · Dedicated line: 33 (only general SME/employment programmes open to SE)
    The Ministry of Economy's research institute (2024) reports only general state measures ('государство на уровне нормативно-правовых актов предусматривает меры поддержки, льготы, преференции': employment quotas, reduced single-tax rates) and no funding line for social enterprises: 'only general SME/employment programmes open to SE'. · source 1
  • N2 · Instrument types: 0 (none)
    N1 at 33: 'none, or N1 <= 33'. · source 1
  • N3 · Continuity: 0 (none)
    N1 at 33: 'none, or N1 <= 33'. · source 1
  • N4 · Execution: 0 (no evidence)
    N1 at 33: 'no evidence, or N1 <= 33'. · source 1
8.3

Policy composite 16.4 of 100 (mean of the eight indicators). No SE law, definition or strategy; SE operates through general forms with limited, project-based support, and EU engagement with authorities has been scaled down since 2020.

Cite this profile

Social Entrepreneurship Observatory & SENIC. (2026). Belarus: SEI 2026 country profile (provisional edition, version 0.9.4). Social Entrepreneurship Index. https://seindex.org/countries/belarus/